India has a great tradition of enlightened Hindu holy men, ascetics and mystics: men with long beards and little clothing who wander the country bringing enlightenment to the masses. Some of these “godmen” — as they are popularly known in the Indian press — have millions of followers. And a good number of them — not unlike their televangelists counterparts back in the U.S. — have also become millionaires, which can be, um, slightly at odds with their image as people who eschew the material world. And, like their Bible-thumping colleagues on the other side of the globe, they seem particularly prone to, well, shall we say, lapses of the flesh. Or maybe we should just say that for some of these swamis, their knowledge of the Mahabharat and the Bhagvad Gita is matched by their practice of the Kama Sutra.
Last week saw dueling sex scandals involving Hindu holy men. First, a television channel ran a sting operation in which it filmed Swami Nithyananda, an extremely popular godman who runs a major ashram just outside the IT hub of Bangalore, getting it on with a woman believed to be (her face is a bit blurry in the video) a well known Tamil film star (although there is some debate about whether it is Ragasudha or Ranjitha.)
Following airing of the tape, the swamis enraged followers - feeling betrayed by Nithyananda’s seeming hypocrisy — attacked his ashrams in both Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. The police also filed charges against him for “cheating” and “enraging people’s religious sentiments.” (If only that were a crime in America too!) The swami was forced to release a statement assuring his followers that he had done “nothing illegal” — not exactly the strongest denial ever.
Then, in an even bigger scandal, a popular mystic named Shiv Murat Dwivedi was arrested by Delhi police and charge with running a prostitution ring involving up to 100 of his female devotees, including many “respectable” girls — college students and airline stewardesses — with middle class backgrounds or, at least, middle-class aspirations, as well as some “society women,” according to a report in The Straits Times. The report also said that “Dwivedi, who worked as a security guard at a five-star hole and at a massage parlour before taking to religion, was said to have amassed more than 600 million rupees ($10 million) over a period of 10 years [through prostitution and other illegal activities.]” There are other reports that Dwivedi had a criminal record for prostitution previously and that he remade himself following his release from prison as a holy man. He may have lured the women into his prostitution ring with promises of access to the rich and powerful and then blackmailed them to get them in the game. According to another report, while some of the women volunteered to work in the guru’s sex business, others were coerced, perhaps because the swami had loaned them money to pay for schools or training courses.
It is always remarkable that more people don’t see these phony gurus for what they are: con artists. Belief in swamis and gurus seems particularly widespread in India, again even among classes of people who, in the West, would not be the sorts to fall for the acts of televangelists. For an interesting discussion of this phenomenon, I recommend the tail end of a chapter called “The Imaginary Horse,” in Edward Luce’s great survey of contemporary India, In Spite of The Gods.
More on these topics:
Add new tag, ashram, Bhagvad Gita, Edward Luce, godmen, In Spite of the Gods, Kama Sutra, Mahabharat, prostitution ring, Ragasudha, Ranjitha, sex, sex scandal, sex sting, sex tape, Shiv Murat Dwivedi, Swami Nithyananda, Swami Nityananda, Swami sex scandal






















Rajesh says:
Jeremy Kahn's penchant for hyperbole is only matched by his veiled hatred for Hinduism it seems.
As in any population or grouping, there is a sheer issue of statistics.. He mentions the few bastards who never were "svamis" in the first place but acted like they were, and Jeremy seems to mention them like they are the majority - which, they most definitely are not.
A sweeping generalization in the form of the hate mongering title like the one published doesn't help the truth-seeking image of this site.
Even in other groupings of people - namely, christian pastors, or even professional groups such as Accountants or doctors, who are selected by an organized body; bodies that have a duty to weed out the bad, one can see malpractices aplenty.
In a completely ad-hoc grouping of people as svamis (whose true meaning, unlike what is suggested in dictionaries, does not mean any of
1. lord; master: a Hindu title of respect, esp. for a Hindu religious teacher
2. a learned man; pundit
(agreed,these are not incorrect current day connotations) but the real meaning simply is "one who is with god - one who _strives_ to be united with the paramatman")
what is critical to understand is that the title is not something one adorns or can buy.... but it is given by people because of what they see in that person. Does it mean that cheats cannot get the "title" to go about their nefarious business? No, not at all.. But, does it mean that everyone who is considered a svami by the populace is a sex addicted pathological liar in the garb of a sanyasi? No. Not anymore than one pedophile pediatrician is a symbol of the majority.
I would suggest that Jeremy stop taking cheap shots at an entire group to get his 15 minutes of fame, but take a deep and hard look at the statistics before he feels the compelling need to crucify an entire group for the failings of an undeserving few.
Why Ask Why says:
Swami Jeremy (has a nice ring to it), I am still not any the wiser as to why they can't keep it in their loincloths. Will the wise swami reveal the whys, instead of revealing the whats or else be stuck with the label of fake swami, er journalist.